People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away.
What are the causes of this?
What problems does it lead to?
In recent years it has become far more normal for people to live in a throwaway society and there could be several reasons why this is the case. To illustrate, the main causes of this phenomenon will be discussed and, finally, some problems that come from this subject will be analyzed.
Firstly, on an individual level, many people are prone to a materialistic life. To take Iranian people as an example, apparently, show that these people have a superficial view of the world and just focus on the materialistic sides of their surroundings. In other words, there is nothing more important than their trendy lifestyle since they use goods for a short time and then throw them away because they became out-of-date. Another reason seems to be the influence of media on human’s life. In this fast-paced world, technology revolutionized all aspect of our lives day to day and business companies struggle to persuade people to purchase new staffs and replace with old ones through tricky advertising. Thus, these make it clear why people throwing things away after a short time while they are useful.
On the other hand, this phenomenon leads to a variety of problems on society and family in terms of financial and environmental. For example, from the financial point of view, those people who are under the poverty line and because of a slavish manner follow the fashion lifestyle, laying them in a severe economic condition since they borrow money to do it. Moreover, this trend causes some environmental problem. The number of disused staffs has increased as using them for a short period of time and get rid of them by dumping nearby or pouring them into the river. From this, it becomes quite evident that financial and environmental perhaps are the main problems which result in society and family scale.
In conclusion, the current century has seen a sharp increase in the number of people who live in a throwaway society. This essay represented the root causes of this subject and the problems do it leads to society and family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | dinhthu05 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | lhm.ils | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | hanhkatori2402 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Architecture | 79 | view |
- Scientists agree that many people eat too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problem can be solved by educating people, while others believe that education will not work.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people argue that the fittest strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports But other people think that success is as much related to mental attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 66
- Some people think subjects taught in school are a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type of education is useful for students.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 73
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...has increased as using them for a short period of time and get rid of them by dumping nearby o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90751445087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66608745533 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9589639403 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378528887746 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112431100654 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053545409296 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208722842134 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264583971252 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.