TPO 42
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
For years, job had been viewed as a means to live a life but people are taking a fresh look at it. Nowadays people are trying to enjoy their jobs as an inherent part of their lives more than they used to do before. They are trying to diminish exhaustion and boredom of their jobs. Trying to do so, the question is, in which way employees are more satisfied, when they have many different types of tasks to do or when they do similar tasks all day long. The answer can be viewed from different perspectives which are elaborated upon on ensuing paragraphs.
First outlook suggests that when workers have various assignments to do they feel less bored than the time they have to do identical tasks. Human per se is variety seeking. She gets tired when getting stuck in dailiness. Doing routine stuff every day and all day long is not the ideal way of living she wants. Therefore, individuals are seeking for the ways to diversify their tasks in their jobs, so that they feel less fatigued and bored. Jobs that provide different types of tasks to do are more desirable for these people. For the above reasons companies and institutions, these days, are looking for methods to make workplace more enjoyable and increase productivity, and task diversification is one of them.
Unlike the first viewpoint discussed above, the second one indicates that having to do lots of different tasks can reduce worker’s focus on her job. An individual can concentrate more on her tasks if she has fewer to do. She can allocate her time and focus exclusively on the duty she has to fulfill at the moment rather than having to divide her time between several tasks and schedule to do them. On the other hand, multiplicity of tasks, itself, can cause exhaustion. Since every assignment requires a lot of time, energy and attention to be carried out and this can get the employee into trouble and exhaust her if she has lots of various and distinct tasks to do. Therefore, trying to diversify tasks we should inevitably take their effects on each other and also on the employee into account.
All things considered, it can be concluded that despite of its benefits, diversification of tasks in a job can also have negative points. Thus, in my opinion, we need to strike an equilibrium between the quality of the tasks done and their quantity, such that the quality of work is neither sacrificed for the large number of tasks and its disturbance of concentration, nor it is sacrificed for their low number and its negative effects on productivity.
- TPO 18Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 76
- TPO 20Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 45 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...yees are more satisfied, when they have many different types of tasks to do or when they do si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73529411765 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65413931021 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504524886878 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0581279456 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.65 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407502492715 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126532234471 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144278521327 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261489323613 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136039409777 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.