Governments should allocate most educational resources on science subjects. Do you agree?
In modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on whether governments should allocate most of his educational resources on science subjects. While, some people argue that that there are more advantages in allocating resources on science subjects compared to other subjects, on my point of view governments should spend their resources on subjects according to the prevailingmarket trends. In this essay, I shall discuss on the factors which would strengthen my arguement while considering the both sides of the arguemnt.
First and foremost, there are myriad number of advantages that countries can achieve through investing on aesthetics and other science subjects such as students will have equal opportunity in learning any subjects they want. For instance, if a person is interested on aesthetic subject, they can learn it at there school together with his normal curriculum. Other than that, people can generate income through entertainment industry which is in an upcoming industry.
On the other hand, if governments spend only on science subjects people will not have a place to learn subjects like foreign languages, sports or subjects like astronomy and etc. For example, if only science subjects are taught in schools people will be like robots and they will not know how to enjoy life and even more they will not aware on balancing their lives. However, almost all the governments have to invest on major subjects such as science, maths, english and etc.
In conclusion, it is recommended to allocate their funds to education in proportiante to the job market requirements, while ensuring students rights of learning every subject.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports of music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both views and g 73
- Function of a university 85
- Advantages and disadvantages of video games 81
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a postive or negative development? 84
- Fast food has become a part of our society. What is the impact of fast food on human life? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ence subjects. While, some people argue that that there are more advantages in allocating...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o learn subjects like foreign languages, sports or subjects like astronomy and et...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ges, sports or subjects like astronomy and etc. For example, if only science subjects a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ubjects such as science, maths, english and etc. In conclusion, it is recommended to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33840304183 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83812734394 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4234172481 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197417138033 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916377613245 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13098858205 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128059972101 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131731416736 0.0609392437508 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.