Self-driving vehicles pros and cons? to what extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years there has been colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend that drive-less vehicles are always tremendous ways in benefits. Some people believe that self-driving is a big aid to the human life. While others disagree. In this essay, I will elaborate both escalating and plummeting facets of autonomous driving.
At the outset, there are myriad benefits, firstly, in today’s world the advance technology of drive less technology made easier means of travel, highly advanced technology covers up the longer distance in shortest time, programmable software which had a great aid to human life. For example, in most of the countries, because of human driving, and of heavy traffic over in cities, stressed up situations, anxiety, or drunk lead to crashes, accidents and thus increases the fatality rates, clearly, thanks to the technology which served a lot of people of having safest means of travel.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on potential benefits of drive-less technology, in some point of contemplating, self-driving is failure in human life, the software & hacking that can lead to treats; crashes or road accidents and so on. For instance, a survey conducted by driving school in Perth contemplated that 35% of people had found failed results when tested to participate in human drive was seen lack in driving skills when required in case of emergency, it also noted there are many chances of hacking during drive can divert in criminal activities. Apparently, drive-less technology made tougher human life by increasing fatality rates and made them dependent of autonomous technology.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite of having this technology but the upsides of negative impacts on self-driving shall need to be averted until more sophisticated advancement in the technology to be innovated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | Thaarika | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | maniram vicky | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | venkatesh1018 | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | rajujon | 79 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Online games should be banned for school students. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience. 80
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 85
- It is important for children to take extra classes or play after school Discuss both and give your opinions 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...driving is a big aid to the human life. While others disagree. In this essay, I will ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the shortest'.
Suggestion: in the shortest
...echnology covers up the longer distance in shortest time, programmable software which had a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the safest'.
Suggestion: having the safest
...hnology which served a lot of people of having safest means of travel. However, there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem dependent of autonomous technology. To recapitulate from the arguments afore...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41216216216 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98553158743 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.351100623 50.4703680194 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.2 104.977214359 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117428116639 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500224263106 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041202613795 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748749002098 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403644574306 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.