Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Children as a vulnerable part of our society are the subject for many psychologists, socialists, or even economist as their necessities require a careful assessment to hinder them from any danger or damage. The controversial question is that if television advertising should target adolescents directly or not? Many hold this idea that it is pretty harmful to them; however, some people believe that there nothing wrong with that. The following statement will argue about the adverse consequences and reasons that tv ads may have for our adolescents.
First, they hurt their physical health. Many of these advertising promote the toys which don't have FDA approval and may cause devastating effects on children's well-being. Imagine a three years old child is crying for thirty minutes and her mom cannot stop her by any means. All of a sudden a tv ad shows up on tv screen which is promoting a colorful play-do, and the baby gets mesmerized by what they are showing and so she stops crying. Her exhausted mom may unconsciously ponder that the product is a way to make the baby feel better. Then the mom takes her phone and makes a haphazard purchase. But the toy may cause many problems such as skin rashes, allergic reactions, asthma attack, diarrhea, etc. That why direct tv ads for children is considered as a treat for them.
Second, they might be dangerous for babies emotional state as well. For example, a very stubborn child may find these ads as a way to get attention from her/his parents. He/she may start screaming or crying when the ads are getting shown and urge the parents to buy that toy for them. Most of the parents lose their temper and start blaming them or oppositely give the baby much attention. The child will find a perfect mean, which is tv ads, in this case, to make her/his parents react substantially more than regular time of day. That will change to a very unhealthy habit for them to give attention by asking for an object. There is no doubt
Thirdly, most of these adds are manipulative; they know that the adults are more resistant to purchase stuff. Therefore, the business holder's see it better to address babies with less state of resilience and expectations. So, they misuse parents' weakness against their beloved ones. Since most parents cannot resist their children requesting a toy from a tv ad. As it is clear, they are manipulating the parents and using their sense of parenting which is not ethically acceptable. Therefore, The deceptive aims behind tv apps which target babies is another reason to reject this idea.
All in all, the reasons as mentioned earlier will convince everyone who is delicate to children's mental, physical health. Besides, there is no doubt that their hidden manipulative purposes are for forcing the parents to buy the product for their children. The inevitable question is whether the tv needs to diminish the advertisements which happen getting produced directly toward or children?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 76
- Television advertising directed children toward young children (aged 2 to 5) should not be allowed 73
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 80
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop you essay. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...uld target adolescents directly or not? Many hold this idea that it is pretty harmful to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hese advertising promote the toys which dont have FDA approval and may cause devasta...
^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asking for an object. There is no doubt Thirdly, most of these adds are manipula...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts weakness against their beloved ones. Since most parents cannot resist their childr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.936 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65984661212 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6720241836 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4074074074 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5185185185 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 3.85842293907 441% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911228020425 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285987012128 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398241422814 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632367541905 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430283385047 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.