Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work. Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology?
It is clear that high-tech devices are now widely used by workers in most work places. This is due to the fact that the rapid growth of technology has brought an influx of benefits to our working these days. From my perspective, despite the vital role of it, there are still some potential drawbacks if people are too dependent on technology.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that modern gadgets have revolutionized our ways of working. Firstly, Internet provides us with instant access to information in almost subject, which is of great value when it comes carrying out researches. Secondly, it is computers and many software programs that help people with data processing. These programs are operated to produce calculations at a high level of accuracy and dealing with a large amount of database. Another advantage is the connection with workers in other countries. This could be done by video meetings held on Skype, Messenger or many other types of platform.
On the other hand, there are also several disadvantages if people too rely on gadgets and devices. Firstly, many meetings requiring important decision-making still need face to face communication. Discussions on online videos can undergo some unwanted situations such as losing connection or unclear voices. In addition, computer programs at the moment can not replace human in making right decisions since they are only able to determine whether the data is true or false. Therefore, it is still human who can select the right information for specific studies or reports.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that technology is of paramount importance since it has made positively radical changes in the way we work. However, people still need to learn how to use it wisely and properly to produce desirable working outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-17 | heltran2001ha | 78 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. 61
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Agree or Disagree? 78
- The governments' investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 78
- Should teachers have cooperative classrooms or competitive classrooms? Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...searches. Secondly, it is computers and many software programs that help people with...
^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun software seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much software', 'a good deal of software'.
Suggestion: much software; a good deal of software
...searches. Secondly, it is computers and many software programs that help people with data pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to rely'?
Suggestion: to rely
...re also several disadvantages if people too rely on gadgets and devices. Firstly, many m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13265306122 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83015476949 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5795106491 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127573300265 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390833209382 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513257419557 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085997645795 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576280333103 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.