The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs illustrate the amount of money parents spending on their children’s sporting activities every month in average and the number of children taking part in three types of sports in Britain from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, it is apparent that British parents pay more money each year for their children’s participation in sports. In term of the participant numbers, football took the first place for having the highest players, compared to Athletics and swimming.
Parents in Britain spent an average of 20 pounds on their children’s sports in 2008. Over the next 6 years, there was a gradual improvement to just over 30 pounds in the British parents’ payment for their children’s sport activities.
In 2008, football was the most popular sport in Britain with 7.5 million children taking part in, while there were only 2 million children enrolling in swimming and about 1 million players joining Athletics. The number of children playing football remained steady around 8 million players between 2008 and 2014. While the figure for Swimming doubled from 2 million participants, the Athletics player number fluctuated at an increasing pace from 1 million players to 5 million players over the period of 2008-2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, compared to Athletics and swimming. Parents in Britain spent an average of 2...
^^^
Line 7, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n players over the period of 2008-2014.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35353535354 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95091290117 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0832611207 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392550465902 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195220845145 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101207033731 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255116730899 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877770452846 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.