The development of tourism contributes to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?
The growth of tourism industry has made English the most widely spoken language all over the world. It is argued that English may predominant all over other languages and eventually lead to their disappearances. Much as having one language definitely bring potential benefits on economy along with mutual understanding, this also has some hardships people have to cope with.
First and foremost, there is no denying that the people can reap a plethora of merits when using only one language in every aspects of life. Initially, having a single language spoken in the world will make it much easier to foster inter-cultural communication between distinct cultural backgrounds. Sharing the same language facilitates transmission of ideas, values, and religious beliefs, which will make an enormous contribution to diminish the probability of creating conflicts at times when differing beliefs collide. Another evident benefit of this phenomenon is that it plays an integral part in the process of boosting the national economy. With all people speaking a language, there will be less barriers as well as misunderstanding among countries, which leads to much more efficacious trade negotiations, a sharp increase in foreign investments, resulting in a healthy world economy.
Nonetheless, I believe that people also have to face up with some difficulties proceeding from this phenomenon. At the outset, having only one language spoken means that other languages accompanied by their cultural identity will disappear. In all likelihood, individuals will find it so difficult to inhibit their time-honored/long-standing culture with centuries- old customs. The world cultural diversity with unique traditions and perspectives from each country will be driven on the verge of being at a complete loss. In addition to it, the above mentioned drawback is the main cause to the collapse of the tourism industry. The same culture and language make it unnecessary for people to travel with the aim of broadening their horizon about distinct cultural backgrounds. As a consequence, it is likely that there will be a significant fall in the numbers of tourists in each nation, which inevitably exerts an adverse impact on the national economy where tourism is a backbone industry.
To conclude, I strongly believe that maintaining indigenous culture and languages should be prioritized to ensure a rich world heritage for future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | viraj.mota51 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Sevvara1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | anita@24 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 81 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | vikasnautiyal | 78 | view |
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 89
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty. How can this be solved? 73
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- There is a fact that a number of parents now increasingly desire to send their children to study oversea What are the reasons for this trend 66
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 703, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun barriers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ople speaking a language, there will be less barriers as well as misunderstanding am...
^^^^
Line 2, column 774, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...erstanding among countries, which leads to much more efficacious trade negotiation...
^^
Line 3, column 998, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y where tourism is a backbone industry. To conclude, I strongly believe that mai...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48138297872 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21612389685 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7370863262 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8125 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314536352509 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104983053343 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653810046123 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195146476597 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755618618547 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.