In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think the development is positive or negative ?
Traffic has always been a burning issue for any governments in every countries all over the world. Several measures have been taken to decrease traffic such as imposing congestion tax during peak hours. I believe this as a positive development.
There are several advantages of congestion tax. Firstly, imposing tax can reduce rush hour traffic jam in urban areas. People are discouraged from using their own vehicles and this method encourage them to use public transport. If many people have access to public transport, they will stop going by car. Hence, the congestion will gradually decline. In addition, using public transports will save the money and resources of both individuals and society. Secondly, imposition on congestion helps government earn more legitimate revenue. Therefore, they can invest that amount to improve its transport infrastructures as well as upgrading and expanding public transport provision. For example, the authorities of London have spent a large amount of money on improving capacity and reliability of the subway system in order to ease traffic flow in city centre.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, i believe that one of main advantages of congestion charge is to alleviate environmental problems. This regulation limits the use of personal vehicle. Due to fewer car used, the exhaust fumes from cars will be less. Consequently, air and noise pollution will be lessened, which contribute to protecting the environment. Furthermore, the city become more attractive for pedestrians and cyclists, which will help increase quality of life.
In conclusion, for all reasons mentioned above, I believe that the congestion tax is a progressive turn as it is beneficial for both citizens and environment as a whole.
- In some countries the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think the development is positive or negative 85
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching Tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the practical benefits expressed above, i believe that one of main advantages of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40579710145 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96677852851 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.849165487 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8888888889 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203715785961 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631984868979 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671861064122 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124098532256 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644131464051 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.