A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
As many people may think that a fixed curriculum for before the college-level study could be helpful for students to adopt fundamental knowledge, however, there might be more benefits to endorse a customized education for middle school students to embrace a greater future success.
First, it is common and normal that individuals develop interests in different disciplinaries, and become specialized in a certain area before they choose majors when they are enrolled in colleges. Shaping the high-school level classes to a single form could decrease the variety of subjects and leave the teenagers fewer options to go with their special interests. For example, the same curriculum for the whole nation may not include special education of carpenter or traditional Chinese, but a student who has talent in certain subjects or areas should be able to gain the teaching resource he or she needs from the middle school level education.
Second, teenagers may not completely realize what they would like to specialize in for the rest of their life when they need to make the choice after they get into college, however, increasing exposure to multiple subjects and areas during middle school time can significantly help them to obtain the knowledge they need for future life decisions. Having varied exposure provided by a customized curriculum could help them save the time of trying in their future education and career.
Although a fixed identical national curriculum could culture the students all over the country to have the same knowledge and life skills, however, individuals in different areas of the country may actually need a different kind of skills set. For example, students living in multi-population areas might find that learning Spanish or another second popular language is a must for better communicating with the local residents, but for students in a mostly single-ethnic suburb, learning a language chosen by the national curriculum might not be the best use of school teaching resource, since they won't have the equal opportunity to practice the language in daily life, and it might be a better option for them to learn the class when they enter universities or start to have the need to use a second language. In that case, a universally required curriculum for the whole nation is not the most suitable education for all middle-school level students.
In conclusion, having the education system in different areas of the nation to develop the pre-college level curriculum that aligns with their own best of interests would be a better option than having a nation-wide same curriculum that may ignore some specialties of the students' individual and the local area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 83
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 35
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 35
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21889400922 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83681354622 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.367252585 60.3974514979 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 226.5 118.986275619 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.4 23.4991977007 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24227501379 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104631949217 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060137550476 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138220189257 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518943971064 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.9 14.1392134831 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 48.8420337079 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.1743820225 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.