The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a few recent years, thanks to the prosperity of technology the medial media services have been increasingly developing. There is the argument that the content of media should be focused on a number of good messages. While I partly agree with this opinion, I also believe that bad news should be put on editorial programs.
On the one hand, the news which consists of cheerful news should be reported on media channels such as TVs, Radios, newspapers and the Internet as well. The reliable reason which is put forward to explain this view is that hearing more positive news will benefit many aspects of human life. A case point can be seen in the economy. In fact, a new that there is a reduced debt interest rate in banks which is considered as good information with businesses or corporations will raise their optimism. It means that these commercial organizations will borrow more amount of money from credit organizations to invest more in their various activities which in turn improving the scale and prosperity of the businesses and get more profits.
On the other hand, the media should report more good news, which does not mean that bad information is ignored. It is misguided to introduce restrictions on bad messages. Since, although the kind of new can sadden readers as well as listeners, people need to be informed of the dark sides of daily lives to keep abreast of contemporary issues over the world. In particular, reporting news of natural disasters such as climate changes, hurricanes or ecological destructions will not only help people prevent from many serious consequences but also raise public’s awareness of the protection of the environment. As a result, a lot of actions would be undertook undertaken to conserve ecological systems, which allows the condition of the environment to improve considerably.
In conclusion, although many people think that more good news should be shown by the media, I broadly agree with this idea. Furthermore, I also think that the media also pay attention to bad information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 84
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 73
- Today, many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. What are the reasons for this and is it a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02647058824 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86920621264 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0258180085 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281297410396 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976647590664 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922426841398 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181900145773 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243669760528 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.