Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work. Do these positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
For centuries, people have fantasized that someday machines could have intelligence like mankind and work as faithful servants. Nowadays, it is common that more and more jobs and tasks which involve hard physical work are done by machines. Although some people believe the positive impacts of the tendency would far more than the negative ones, I believe the issue of the wide application of machines can be deemed as beneficial as detrimental.
On the one hand, there is no denying that hi-tech machines bring about an array of positive aspects, such as high work efficiency and low work risk. First, the workload that could take months to finish by manual labor could be done flawlessly by machines in minutes, which allows individuals to be involved in other more meaningful and challenging activities. It means ordinary workers could have more time and energy to enjoy their life. Second, it is widely acknowledged that machines could substitute man for high-risk jobs, like mining and construction, which commonly involve hard physical work. By adopting machines in those work places, people’s safety can be ensured to a considerable degree.
On the other hand, there are numerous demerits which should not be neglected. To begin with, more people may lose jobs or suffer great layoff pressure when machines take their places, especially in the mass production industry such as the automobile business. In factories of the famous car company Ford, almost every step of assembly line work is done by giant robots that work faster with higher reliability and precision. As a consequence, employees will suffer great pressure resulting from layoff. Besides, machines cannot work in a flexible way as people do, and they are less likely to make corresponding changes once something unexpected happens. If a wrong code runs in one machine, there may be thousands of defective products appearing on the production line.
Taking all factors into account, although machines have many merits that make our life easier and more convenient, the demerits should not be ignored as workers may be afflicted with unemployment stress and the number of inferior goods may be huge.
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 81
- Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opin 84
- Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opin 61
- Some people believe that teachers and parents should supervise children s activities closely while others think they need more freedom Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Some people say that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...m layoff. Besides, machines cannot work in a flexible way as people do, and they are less likely ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, second, so, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20797720798 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70220072966 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584045584046 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3633023363 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.866666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283950019792 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101516138154 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119660374262 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179037934808 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107003454004 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.