The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981 ,1991 and 2001
The pie charts compares the percentage of annual expenditure by a certain UK school in three years, 1981, 1991, 2001.
Overall, teachers salaries’ made up the largest proportion in total spending in all three given years. In addition, while school tended to spend more money in insurance and furniture and equipment, there was a decreasing trend in the percentage of others.
In 1981, teachers salaries’ with 40%, was ranked in the first position, followed by other workers’ salaries with 28% of the total amount school spent on. While resources and furniture was similar, reaching 15% in the starting year, the figure for insurance was only 2%.
Teachers salaries experienced an increasing variation in its proportion, hitting a peak of a half in the year 1991, and ended the period with 45%. Whereas there was a significant decline in the percentage of money on other workers salaries and resources to 15% and 9%, respectively, the school had seen a considerable rise in that of furniture and equipment with 23% in 2001. Additionally it is noticeable that the greatest difference can be seen for insurance when its proportion rocketed and quadrupled that in 1981 with 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-22 | miavu27 | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Love kaler | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010 78
- Some people think that it is important for children to learn lessons outside the classroom by visiting public buildings In what extend do you agree or disagree 65
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...rniture and equipment with 23% in 2001. Additionally it is noticeable that the greatest diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18556701031 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99957484499 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0130184794 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2005678714 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101711423259 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143732434463 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174554439294 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176099371698 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.