Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, whether technology has allowed us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by some that technology had brought numerous negative impacts to the society, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a number of individuals. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that technologies in medicine, education and industries had broaden our horizons and increased productivities around the world.
To begin with, it is impossible to deny the fact that technology increased the productivity of almost every industry in the world. Online shopping has allowed goods to be purchased at anytime and anywhere around the world. Businesses can purchase their raw materials from multiple places with reduced prices. Researches conducted by Ministry of Foreign Affairs show that companies made huge progress after the invention of computers and internet. Therefore, technology in production improved our daily lives with cheaper goods and services.
Furthermore, evolution of medical technology benefits humans with advanced medical treatments for cancer, diabetes and hypertension. Through these technologies, people are living a healthier and longer life. For example, cholera which used to be a disease without cure, now can be prevented with advanced vaccine. Also, educational technology broadens young people’s view of the world with easily accessed online information. Students can have virtual classrooms with other students and teachers from other side of the world. Hence, medical and educational technologies have improved our qualities of lives and sparked our brains with new ideas and views.
In conclusion, the progress we have made by technology are enormous and tremendous, which is undeniable. It brought us a more helpful and interesting lives with easy accessed information and encouraged creativity and innovation with improved communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2020-08-15 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | joyspacechou0130 | 94 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | Kushi | 95 | view |
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people’s health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and implications. 77
- Happiness index is becoming a new national success rather than only economic growth. What do you think about this idea? What can be used to measure happiness index? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
... medicine, education and industries had broaden our horizons and increased productiviti...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
... medicine, education and industries had broaden our horizons and increased productiviti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75172413793 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06125338626 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0538579054 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.25 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201244643551 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071496105816 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115528022678 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138558691132 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849488067998 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.