A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Although a national curriculum allow students to learn basic information, it stifles the way students learn and how teachers approach teaching. A national curriculum limits the knowledge that students acquire and does not create room for flexibility. Thus, I disagree with the recommendation that students should study the same national curriculum
Every child is unique, and each student has a way of understanding a concept. A national curriculum will put a system in place that compel students to learn a concept the same way. For instance, some students learn vocabulary by writing new words down and formulating sentences out of it whiles some learn it by phonics. A national curriculum might choose one method of teaching over another and this will hinder the very students they want to improve
Teachers know their student best and know the methods that works best for a particular group of student. By introducing a national curriculum, teachers are limited to a particular approach in teaching a subject. As stated earlier, students have different ways of learning, thus teachers have to continually develop techniques that all student to have a basic understanding of a particular concept
A national curriculum limits the knowledge students learn. This is because a group of people decides what enough for students to study is. This in turn does not create room for flexibility and does not make students curious. All they know is to study a particular concept and pass examination. This does not foster people who are inquirers and creative.
The idea of national curriculum is laudable in some regards but it is far stretched. In place of a national curriculum, there should be a national guideline or standard. This must be flexible but at the same time allow the student to study some basic information that is essential in all aspect of life. Basic information such as Mathematics, Science, and English just to name a few. A basic knowledge of English will teach students how to express themselves. Basic Mathematics and science will allow students to understanding finance, interpret data and know how the universe and nature functions. This guideline will teach students know what the need to learn before they become adults
There is a hackneyed quote that “if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing its stupid”. Thus, we do not have to force teachers and students to teach and learn the same thing the same way. Rather we should create a national standard for that allows the student to have basic knowledge and is flexible enough for them to explore other areas and be creative.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould study the same national curriculum Every child is unique, and each student ...
^^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the very students they want to improve Teachers know their student best and kno...
^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...xamination. This does not foster people who are inquirers and creative. The idea of na...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... and learn the same thing the same way. Rather we should create a national standard fo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o explore other areas and be creative.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05215419501 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81351165283 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430839002268 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6951534101 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.095238095 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357694419708 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128680913532 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861694145096 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220681186467 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676870496425 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.