To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A society is a confluence of a number of elements. It is made up of beings, relations, interactions, and everything else conducive to these factors. In order to understand such a society, we need to consider all those parameters which contribute towards its development. One such parameter is the geography of a society.
It is often argued that the study of major cities should be a consideration while learning about the most important characteristics of a society. To some extent, I find this argument flawed. Even though cities can be good sources for deciphering the nuances of a society, it would be misleading to restrict our scope to these concrete jungles.
The fabric of the human world comes from the villages and small towns of any country. The advancements we have made in fields of technology, economy, literature or weaponery wouldn’t have been possible without going through the foundation of a bucolic life. While the cities are worthy platforms for exhibiting the know-how of any society, we have years of secrets stashed in the roots of our ancestral pastoral lands. The Israeli author Yuval Noah Harari was able to unravel the mystery behind the rise of ‘Sapiens’ as the ruler of the biotic world by going deep into the mindset of the savage man. Many essential inventions of the modern world find a strong hold in the non urban life.
One may argue that the current pace of economic and tech growth has shifted the focus from the humble countryside to the glamourous townships, we cannot ignore the fact that our modern cities have evolved from the traditional towns of the yesteryears. We surely cannot overlook the humongous cities reinventing themselves as buzzing hubs of social activities but we need to maintain a trade off between the small and the big lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 25
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00662251656 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93162883257 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5731414622 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07142857143 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937390263722 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334809645842 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464999544238 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599785837059 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471790746154 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.