Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Scientists expect that human beings will have no language barrier in the future by using a mutual language. In my view, such a development, although essential at some point, could be seen as a detrimental step forward.
On the one hand, the elimination of language barrier renders people some advantages, especially in education and healthcare. Firstly, speaking the same language in education brings a myriad of opportunities to approach various sources of knowledge. Take History as an example, students from every corner of the world will be able to research other countries' history via English materials published on Internet-based libraries in case English, which all students master worldwide, becomes the mutual language of studying. Secondly, no language conflict in healthcare service is indispensable for the convenience of treatment. In such a proposed development, healthcare service will become a cross-border service. Foreign doctors, accordingly, will advise patients and consult with their colleagues faster and more concise at no risk of misunderstanding due to translation's obstacles.
On the other hand, choosing to speak the same language with other nationalities arouses many severe problems to our cultural identity. Apparently, language plays a pivotal role in protecting intangible cultural heritages which are traditional music, poems or sculptures. These which were created by our ancestors in writing might be forgotten if the next generation use only a novel language that fails to interpret these mentioned intangible assets. Following that, there will be no more remarkable cultures such as Maya Civilization with Quiche and Yucatec, two ancient languages from the south and north respectively; or Vietnamese Nho-characters used in the Feudal Era in Vietnam.
Confronted with this predicted development, we can understand that it brings about both positive and negative effects to us. Personally, I lean towards the idea that this development is socially negative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in the fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money in saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both t 78
- Televisions influence the development of the creativity of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The charts show subway and bus ridership and urban population density in 3 cities in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seen as a detrimental step forward. On the one hand, the elimination of lang...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...he world will be able to research other countries history via English materials published...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ters used in the Feudal Era in Vietnam. Confronted with this predicted developme...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72909698997 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19012006523 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655518394649 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8237346159 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147728553958 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524592630459 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634577202656 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101936047147 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056844537744 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.