Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe
The bar chart illustrates information about the percentages of commuters selecting the modes of transport consisting of bus, car, bicycle and walking to their workplace in a European nation in three separate years of 1950, 1970 and 1990.
Overall, the figures were presented with an upward tendency in opting the private car to and from work in a European nation.
The number of commuters using bus, car, bicycle and walking started at 20%, 7%, roughly 27% and 35% respectively in 1950. There was a significant soar in the percentage of commuters using car from 7% to more than 25% in 1970 before shooting to a peak of roughly 37% in 1990 while the figures for cycling and walking to work experienced a sharp plunge, respectively halving to around 23%, 17% in 1950 before slumping its troughs of more than 7% and 10% in 1990.
In contrast, the proportion of commuters using bus, however, experienced wild fluctuations, climbing slightly to around 27% in 1950 before halving back to roughly 17% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-08 | MinhGoal1 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | lee giang | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 67
- Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the percentages of commuters selecting the modes of transport consisting of bus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7572835853 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3963144129 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554201126134 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303586175533 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255566117514 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348134620556 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205474179286 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.