Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe
The bar chart illustrates information about the percentages of commuters selecting the modes of transport consisting of bus, car, bicycle and walking to their workplace in a European nation in three separate years of 1950, 1970 and 1990.
Overall, the figures were presented with an upward tendency in opting the private car to and from work in a European nation.
The number of commuters using bus, car, bicycle and walking started at 20%, 7%, roughly 27% and 35% respectively in 1950. There was a significant soar in the percentage of commuters using car from 7% to more than 25% in 1970 before shooting to a peak of roughly 37% in 1990 while the figures for cycling and walking to work experienced a sharp plunge, respectively halving to around 23%, 17% in 1950 before slumping its troughs of more than 7% and 10% in 1990.
In contrast, the proportion of commuters using bus, however, experienced wild fluctuations, climbing slightly to around 27% in 1950 before halving back to roughly 17% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-08 | MinhGoal1 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | lee giang | 61 | view |
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and gain better language skills than people watching TV. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- The three charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Compare the percentages of travelers to go to work in a country in Europe 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the percentages of commuters selecting the modes of transport consisting of bus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7572835853 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3963144129 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554201126134 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303586175533 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255566117514 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348134620556 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205474179286 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.