Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.
What problems does it cause?
What could be done to encourage people to buy local products?
Two days ago, I read an article about the influence of big enterprises on the market. The author stated that corporations widely use both promotion and advertisement to change the preferences in shopping. This essay will consider the problems of this change and suggest possible solutions for stimulating people to buy domestic goods.
The first problem is the detrimental pressure on domestic companies. When a large corporation opens its branches in a region, local entrepreneurs usually start to suffer from the unequal competition with it, since they have insufficient funding either to introduce themselves more in the media nor hold promotions more frequently. This results in them gradually losing customers and eventually stopping their activity in the market. Another problem with the entry of large corporations into the area is growing prices. Once the dominance in the market is achieved by various advertising campaigns, these companies tend to gradually increase the prices. This gradually leads customers to overpay.
Nevertheless, the authorities could support domestic manufacturers. To arouse the interest in buying homemade goods, the government should promote them to the masses. Generally, it is hard to find the information about domestic producers on TV and radio, since they cannot afford advertisement. However, if the government supported them by freely showing homegrown producers on the state channels, such producers would have more opportunities to present themselves to the public. Consequently, society would be aware of local merchandise and probably give them their preference. Furthermore, the state could both subsidize and exempt them from paying several taxes, so that they would be able to lower their prices and expand their production.
In conclusion, even though big companies pose many problems to the inner market, the state officials could raise public awareness of local manufactured items by showing their local products in the media and assist internal manufacturers financially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-07 | Glenn20sal | 73 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 85
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 73
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course. You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter:describe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action 78
- The population of most cities is growing as people move to cities to find work and new opportunities What problems does overpopulation in cities cause How can these problems be solved 65
- Violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the influence of big enterprises on the market. The author stated that corporati...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gradually leads customers to overpay. Nevertheless, the authorities could supp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6568627451 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02293234358 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0300705897 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21334916103 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586792941151 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415840577038 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122347596 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179595046934 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.