Professional sports people are often idolised by young children. Some people think that they, therefore, have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there have been many celebrities being famous for their negatives aspects in their characteristics, which can definitely set a bad example for youngsters. As a result, a lot of people claim that it is crucial for famous people to be a good role model for children, especially professional athletes who are idolized by millions of teenagers and kids around the world. Nonetheless, in my point of view, it is not necessary for them to become a role model at all times for admirers.
At the outset, it is undeniable that in all likelihood, a professional athlete often showing their positive qualities will exert a profound impact on children’s cognitive development. A great numbers of professional sport people have applied themselves to develop their skills, capacities and manifested attempts, determinations and ambition, which can be an enormous inspirational source to adolescents to develop their talents. Furthermore, this statement is also considered as an efficacious way to minimize the feasibility of emulating bad behaviors such as taking drugs, smoking or involved in social evils in children. Not only does it can help adolescents to be a good citizen but it also plays an integral role in the development of the society, diminish the numbers of criminals as well as have a well- educated future generation.
Nevertheless, everyone has their good and bad aspects in their characteristics. It is also essential for famous athletes to be the true version of themselves as an alternative to always having to be a perfect role model for youngsters. This definitely can make a great contribution to lessen the pressure put on famous athletes. As a consequence, it is able to reduce the possibility of suffering from depression, stress and other serious mental problems for famous sport professional people.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that it is unessential for the public to make well known sports people to set a good example at all times.
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer? 73
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than on building a large collection of paper books. To what extent do you agree? 67
- In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities. Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in develo 78
- Nowadays, versions of history taught at some countries are designed to promote national's pride and downplaying or erasing negative events. do you agree or disagree and why? 78
- In the future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional school Which would you prefer 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19375 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28199247552 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6640267549 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312529618875 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113631359786 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783849109836 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198466744977 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624517216256 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.