Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think there are other factors. What other factors should be considered? Within these factors, do you think anyone is more important than the others?
There are many methods to judge the development of a country besides the traditional measure of economic growth. Some of these factors include HDI index and the environment quality index, of which I believe the EQI holds more significance.
Firstly, countries can measure the well-being of the population using the Human Development index (HDI), since it indicates quality of life for people. In details, HDI consists of life expectancy indicator reflecting the length of life, the education indicator reflecting the average level of study attained, and the per capita income reflects standards of living, measured by Gross Nation Income per capita. Secondly, the Environment Quality Index (EQI) is also a useful benchmark, since it explores the relationship between the environment and human health. Specifically, EQI measures how the factors of air, water, land pollution, and ecological balance affect the life and health status of citizens of a country.
In my opinion, among these two factors, EQI index is more important since a clean environment is important to the reputation of a country. For many nations, immigration is a way to measure how attractive it is on the international stage, and people nowadays are increasingly concerned about the environment quality of where they choose to live. For example, thanks to its unbelievably low levels of air and water pollution, as well as expansive coverage of green spaces, Singapore has become a magnet for expatriates and tourists. The island nation is extremely picky about who they choose to let in, which shows how a clean environment can help greatly boost the global prestige of a country.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe EQI index holds more significance in measuring the progress of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | sanjay marwaha | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-13 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29824561404 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96547072494 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550877192982 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2314597997 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.272727273 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113732870624 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505113384965 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434578275846 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806468202 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223446945939 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.