Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
As the amount of residential waste produced in the wake of day by day automation and industrialization increases, so does the concern to recycling waste stream which claimed is not being paid attention to sufficiently. It is true that government by enacting laws would provide a long-term solution in dis regard. However, in my opinion, there is another alternative that shouldn't be ignored.
When governments establish a law with respect to recycling, accordingly, in order for people to not be penalized, it is mandatory to observe it. dis especially can act as a deterrent for those who would not cooperate to recycle their domestic waste despite being aware of its environmental consequences. Interestingly, a while after people are forced to do that, they start to do recycling not coz of their fear of punishment but for their being accustomed to do so, as it is observed in some developed countries. So when governments specify some penalties for not separating out solid residential wastes such as bottles, cans, food packing, food scraps, newspapers, etc. by individuals, in fact, they make it a legal requirement going to be a part of their culture.
While setting out the rules can guarantee the increase of recycling, there is still another approach like raising public awareness, as well. Admittedly, the more people are informed and educated about the importance of recycling, the more responsibly they act. Media as an effective tool to boost public awareness can serve to educate people in how environmentally threatening it would be, when there is no proper action to recycling, repurposing and disposing of the home waste. Apart from that, various mediums can be used to teach people how to recycle and compost their domestic waste properly. Media plays a role as important a part as making regulations does when it comes to people who wouldn’t recycle just coz of their being uninformed.
As outlined above, legislation on recycling and educating people alike are powerful approaches that make people become better recyclers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The two maps below the area of baton bigham in 1937 to 1995 56
- the line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 56
- The two maps below the area of Baton Bingham in 1937 to 1995 85
- people living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 78
- in some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...nion, there is another alternative that shouldnt be ignored. When governments establish...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to doing'.
Suggestion: accustomed to doing
... fear of punishment but for their being accustomed to do so, as it is observed in some developed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, apart from, in fact, such as, in my opinion, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18373493976 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0850829177 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4316845689 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319701403956 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107598523961 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621592938697 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189257874085 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628801198752 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.