A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions old fashioned values such as honour sinus and trust no longer seen important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent years there has been much debate about the features which people based on that are judged such as wealth, social status, luxury car and clothes. I agree with this assertion but in appears to me that the traditional values hold a vital position among people with authenticity. Admittedly, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy which will be elaborated in this essay followed by a reasonable.
On the one hand, the supporters of old-fashioned values put forward compelling reasons to justify their point of view. They believe that the society is shaped by the behavior and mindset of individuals, not the type of dressing or cars. Hence, kindness, honesty, integrity has formed an integral part of everyone’s life. For instance, some of the most famous people such as actors, Football myths or other celebrities are popular due to the spiritual values not for their money and reputation.
On the other hand, the opponents assert that we are living in the materialistic era these days and their connection can bring advantages to them when befriending someone. Moreover, they claim making friends with ordinary person pose a threat to social status. Therefore, these friendships not only honest, real and loyal but also is very dangerous and terrible.
Additionally, in our society rich people are more respectful just because of their personal wealth. . For example, a recent survey by the US Education Dept in 2016 showed that 80% of teenagers judged their classmates on what brand of mobile phone they owned. This research suggests that for many people material belongings are a considerable measure of social importance.
To conclude, there are different arguments on both sides. Even though luxurious life and money is paramount importance for the most of people, but in the point of my view respect, trust and etc cannot eliminate from our daily lives. So, we should stimulated children and young generation to familiar with these culture.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 84 | view |
2019-04-21 | mansoureh | 95 | view |
2019-04-21 | mansoureh | 89 | view |
2018-12-11 | maryam_el20 | 61 | view |
- You recently organized an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they like the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.Write a letter to t 89
- In Many Countries Small Shops And Town Centers Are Going Out Of Business Because People Tend To Drive To The Large Out Of Town Stores This Results In An Increase In Car Use And It Also Means That People Without Cars Have Limited Access To Out Of Town Stor 84
- Many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competitions. Some people think that governments should invest more in ordinary people instead. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples. 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions old fashioned values such as honour sinus and trust no longer seen important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- You are visiting another town next month for a short break. Write a letter to the tourist information center. In your letterTell them how long you are stayingAsk for some suggestions for what to doFind out if there are any local events happening at the ti 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...be elaborated in this essay followed by a reasonable. On the one hand, the supporters of ol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... just because of their personal wealth. . For example, a recent survey by the US ...
^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...d money is paramount importance for the most of people, but in the point of my view respect, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eration to familiar with these culture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77469860573 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633540372671 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.336057487 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154691645969 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439152067807 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041816695827 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765425879217 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420298631044 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.