Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development?
Marriage had been a sacred Institution. However, of late it is being made a larger than life affair, that too on a grander scale. I personally believe that it’s a harmful development for the entire humanity. This essay would analyse, as to why marriages held on such lavish scales would rake a havoc on the society?
The most compelling reason behind marriages becoming such expensive affairs is that everyone loves to flaunt their wealth, their power and their status. Since the affluent begin the trend and the poor gullible simply emulate their celebrations on account of illiteracy. Take for example, Laxmi Narayan Mittal, the richest Indian steel magnate settle in the UK. He had an opulent wedding ceremony for his daughter held at the grandest locations with an array of celebrity guest lasting for weeks, moreover the expenditure of this kind of wedding amounted to a whopping amount of a couple of 100 crores. Yet, the saddest part of this fairy tale wedding was that this marriage also ended up in a divorce in a short span of four months. This kind short-lived happiness does not justify the purpose of behind it.
Now, to further commence with my belief, which states such kinds of marriages full of grandiose are way too detrimental for the entire society, as these kind of grand marriages are highly responsible for corrupting the Indian poor as well as middle class people who get influenced by the glamour and the hype created by such weddings and thus, the poor daughter’s parents are forced to cough up that kind of money to get their daughters married to a decent guy. In order to illustrate, even today so many Indian farmers, are forced to spend their entire lives clearing heavy marriage debts, and when they are unable to clear their loans they end up committing suicide trying to meet the demands of the groom’s side to hold a couple of functions, to gift expensive jewelry as well as even sizable amount of cash. This is a highly wrong precedent started by the rich people who believe spending in giving big parties and sending big money can guarantee happiness, which is certainly not the fact.
To sum up, I firmly uphold my stance against wasteful spending in any kind of marriage. As these kind of marriages does not guarantee success and furthermore, it creates a lot of disparity and a feeling of spite among the poor for the rich.
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large no. of young adults compared with the no. of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company or organization.Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone now days than in the past.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept difficult situations such as having an unsatisfactory job or a lack of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... detrimental for the entire society, as these kind of grand marriages are highly responsib...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ul spending in any kind of marriage. As these kind of marriages does not guarantee success...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84634146341 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56114401305 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.717898695 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.466666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123618162474 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437289229369 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332954453855 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794504456758 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450892962665 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.