Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development?
Marriage had been a sacred Institution. However, of late it is being made a larger than life affair, that too on a grander scale. I personally believe that it’s a harmful development for the entire humanity. This essay would analyse, as to why marriages held on such lavish scales would rake a havoc on the society?
The most compelling reason behind marriages becoming such expensive affairs is that everyone loves to flaunt their wealth, their power and their status. Since the affluent begin the trend and the poor gullible simply emulate their celebrations on account of illiteracy. Take for example, Laxmi Narayan Mittal, the richest Indian steel magnate settle in the UK. He had an opulent wedding ceremony for his daughter held at the grandest locations with an array of celebrity guest lasting for weeks, moreover the expenditure of this kind of wedding amounted to a whopping amount of a couple of 100 crores. Yet, the saddest part of this fairy tale wedding was that this marriage also ended up in a divorce in a short span of four months. This kind short-lived happiness does not justify the purpose of behind it.
Now, to further commence with my belief, which states such kinds of marriages full of grandiose are way too detrimental for the entire society, as these kind of grand marriages are highly responsible for corrupting the Indian poor as well as middle class people who get influenced by the glamour and the hype created by such weddings and thus, the poor daughter’s parents are forced to cough up this kind of money to get their daughters married to a decent guy. In order to illustrate, even today so many Indian farmers, are forced to spend their entire lives clearing heavy marriage debts, and when they are unable to clear their loans they end up committing suicide trying to meet the demands of the groom’s side to hold a couple of functions, to gift expensive jewelry as well as even sizable amount of cash. This is a highly wrong precedent started by the rich people who believe spending in giving big parties and sending big money can guarantee happiness, which is certainly not the fact.
To sum up, I firmly uphold my stance against this kind of wasteful spending on any marriage. As, it further engenders disparity and disharmony in a society.
- It is sometimes said that people who do work that is physically hard should be paid as much as people who do work that needs high-level qualifications. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The quality of health care a person receives should not depend on the size of their bank balance The government is responsible for providing a high level of heath care for all its citizens To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 73
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives. What are the reasons and solutions for that? 78
- It is expected that in the future old people are going to outnumber young people in many countries Do you feel this is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... detrimental for the entire society, as these kind of grand marriages are highly responsib...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly uphold my stance against this kind of wasteful spending on any marriage. As, i...
^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asteful spending on any marriage. As, it further engenders disparity and disharmo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86005089059 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56794568846 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.912168894 49.4020404114 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134477622061 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451771524189 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033169551311 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839010028683 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041742417835 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.