1. Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The author of the issue contends that the scandal is more powerful than any speaker and reformer for gathering the attention. This is a claim with which I generally do not agree. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons to rear my standpoint.
The first significant fact which should be considered is the veracity of the scandals. Majority of the scandals are news based on the infamy, dishonor, and exaggeration. In other word, they aim to depict the falsehoods and mistakes which in some cases they possess the wrong and decisive basement. A lucid example of this fact is the current event which happens to our famous actor in Iran. He is one of the well-known and benevolent actors in Iran; however, because of his disagreement with the television about a program, the television reveals an exaggerated scandal about him. Although this news attracts entire attention to itself; its accuracy cannot be verified. Therefore, the validity of the scandals makes it shaky.
Another noteworthy issue which should be considered is the audiences of scandals and scandals’ scope. In most of the cases, the receivers of scandals are not right and responsible persons, and this fumble situation leads to inquietude. This fact gets more importance in political issues. In fact, it is obvious that the most of the citizens do not have this ability for analyzing the political issues; consequently, revealing of this type of crucial data by the individuals whose are not capable of dealing, could end with the chaos in the society.
However, the fact that scandal causes a fast and quick reaction by the responsible person can make my viewpoint insecure. Indeed, the scandal owns the striking feature which makes it bold very quickly; therefore, it gets attention by the governor faster than the other news, and for the sake of its fast speed spread, the leader takes the quick reaction to deal and solve the problem. However, the accuracy and effectiveness of this action are suspicious. According to the noteworthy refreshingly intelligence statics revealed by the Psychology Department of the Tehran University, the possibility of making mistake by the human beings during their haphazard decision-making situations are sixty-five percent more than the ordinary situations. According to this conducted research, the precision of actions taken for solving the issues after the broadcasting scandals should be considered.
To wrap it up, although scandals attract quick attention by the people, its accuracy, its scope of receivers, and the integrity of the taken action for solving the problem degrade it.
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 16
- 1. The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land 89
- A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. At present, the nearest jazz club is over 60 miles away from Monroe; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. In addition, there is ample evi 66
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion for solving the problem degrade it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8893656062 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3551728424 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161137427481 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513542798109 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395159600724 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932615621934 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338657910353 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.