Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time. In your opinion, has technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated?
Nowadays, the relationship between technological devices and peoples; life quality has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world. it is a widely held view that technological gadgets are highly beneficial, while I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of it.
From a social point of view, labor-saving devices are indeed bound to make life easier, which it might lead to both having more free time and doing leisure activities. For instance, a group of profound socialists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between technological achievements, improving lifestyle and making life easier. This evidence presented thus far supports the contention that gadgets are positively correlated with make more free time in individuals' life.
Moreover, in technological terms, technology is undoubtedly attributable to quality of life, in that it would lead to make housekeeping, making a connection and doing routines tasks easier. A well-known example of such attribution is Smartphones, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken to taking having free time for granted. Had technology improved in advance, it might have had the opportunity to live easier. Thus, high-tech devices could play a significant role in peoples' life.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that technology has improved humans' life quality. However, as every garden may have some weeds. The local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to height their intellect.
- Social media and the Internet have bad effects on people as they make communications poor. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples. 88
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes they do not need. give your opinion. 11
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 77
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 85
- These days, more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time, either to find a job or to study. There are clearly many benefits to doing this, but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties.Discuss advantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es and peoples; life quality has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... among the public all around the world. it is a widely held view that technologica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53469387755 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18366300365 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1050978777 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824080315676 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031550926174 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316032750719 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04789715917 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144389971211 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.