Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is difficult to conceive of vigorous economic growth without an efficient transport system. Thus, every government works to enable citizens to commute safely and quickly. However, it raises the question about whether the governments should allocate more money to railways or roads. From my perspective, I strongly believe that the governments should spend more money on the railways system.
First and foremost, I would argue that the governments should expand more railroads rather than roads because railroads could offer time efficiency as well as safe commuting. For instance, the number of road accidents and highway casualties in many countries is far higher than that of the railway casualties. Furthermore, while express trains are able to carry hundreds of people and hundred tonnes of goods, it seems that road transports carry less with slower speed. Therefore, it seems to me that the investment in a more safe and efficient way of commuting is a much more prudent idea.
Secondly, pouring money into railways might not only mitigate traffic problems but also protect the environment. Rail lines are usually located in separate zones which are away from the main road. As a result, if the government invests in this transportation, it could solve traffic congestion by easing traffic flow in the main road. Since trains are environmentally-friendly means of transport as they cause no damage to the environment, the acceleration in the use of trains could be an effective way to combat climate change. On the contrary, the huge amount of exhaust fumes which stems from road vehicles is one of the primary reasons for the global warming.
To sum up, either in a developed or a developing country, the government should invest to build a safer, faster and more reliable transportation system and the railway, for this reason, should be high on the agenda.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employers dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment. What causes global warming? What solutions are there for this problem? 78
- Some people say we do not need to use printed paper newspapers anymore? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 95
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...ernments should spend more money on the railways system. First and foremost, I would ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...re able to carry hundreds of people and hundred tonnes of goods, it seems that road tra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93806538144 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2999974035 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198480072669 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680961220902 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073185408006 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124842747115 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595308358552 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.