Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that high school children should take part in some community services for free like working for a charity, teaching sport for young children. T strongly agree with this idea, given how working in unpaid service helps children with responsibility and the government can utilize the young’s energy to save money.
Firstly, working in unpaid service makes high school more responsible for their own community. Most of the works are held by the non-profit companies, supposed to serve society. Thus, participants have to take care of their own lives. My cousin, for instance, used to be a boy who was very irresponsible for the means of protecting environment. He always littered on the roads and frequently used plastic bags instead of paper bags. Last summer, he joined a non-profit company called “Save Earth”, which aims to protect the environment, as volunteer for fun. But after that, I have never seen him throw garbage on the streets anymore, always litter in prescribed places. My cousin story is a powerful example of how working for free in community services teachs young children to be more responsible for society.
Secondly, from the perspective of government, setting unpaid services into high school programs is the ideal way to save money to invest in more essential programs. High school students are always full of enthusiasm and energy, besides, they spend most of their time to study at school and hardly do anything else. Therefore, of government can utilize this source of labor, they can save a large amount of money. For example, last year, the council of Long Bien District had to pay $5000 for hiring environment workers to clean all the roads. This year, the council launched a program called “Cleaning day”, that encouraged students to clean the roads around their school in every Sunday. As a result, the council had to pay only $1000 for raising fund. Clearly, the council did save a great deal of money by organizing this unpaid program.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I completely believe that unpaid community services should be included as a mandatory program in high school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Lâm Kỳ Như | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | nguyen duc | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | nguyen duc | 78 | view |
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009 87
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people claim that high school child...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the young's energy to save money. Firstly, working in unpaid service makes...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en to be more responsible for society. Secondly, from the perspective of govern...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey by organizing this unpaid program. In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11267605634 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72242409222 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566197183099 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7131922231 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199807743736 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620005861876 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810565318525 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16312532267 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854797335498 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.