What are merits or demerits of studying Films at school?
It is an irrefutable fact that old theatre, films play a vital role in our life. While proponents are considering it as undeniable fact to know about the ancient culture. Opponents perceive that these plays take away us from modern civilization and plays. In my opinion, it has both positive and negative aspects of our life. This essay will discuss both the merits and demerits of this approach and will lead to a plausible conclusion.
On the positive side, firstly, old theatre films play a crucial role in saving rituals and heritage. Thus, if students learn these films in schools, they can get a lot of information about our ancient culture, beliefs, ancestors and their living style as well. Secondly, these are the medium to pass our ancient rights to the next generation. To cite an example, nowadays, olden theatre movies maintained a prominent place in high school’s and university’s subjects, so that students can learn about their ancestors. It is apparent why learning plays and theatres at school are beneficial.
On the negative side, although these plays hold our history and give us a lot of information about old times, sometimes it misguides our youth. For instance, in numbers of older shows, our ancestor’s conservative thinking regarding women is presented. At this point, sometimes children usually got the wrong message, partially it creates anxiety or deviates them against our ancestors. Somewhat they follow the same behavior like giving less importance to the women and behaves like throughout life. So, this is clear that it has numerous negative impacts on our society.
In conclusion, after inspection upon further paragraphs, we can say, “Every rose has its thorns”. So, it has both negative externalities with positive aspects. In a nutshell, we can concede that it is upto us how we take it and learn useful things from these films.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-14 | saqibmaqbool | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | renee nepal | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | renee nepal | 78 | view |
| 2018-05-15 | nipung143 | 72 | view |
| 2017-11-03 | enaslam | 58 | view |
- some people feel that certain workers should be paid more. what is your opinion? 77
- Some people believe laws can change human behavior. Do you agree with this statement? 85
- What are merits or demerits of studying Films at school? 77
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. How much do you agree? 72
- creativity is born with or can be taught or improved. What is your view point? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 20.9802955665 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17532467532 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89999592883 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581168831169 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2765824984 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093897157784 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284238389075 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431448381569 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516213762391 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433689545224 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.