Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The deterioration of air has been an alarming issue across the globe. While some people insist that organizing a no-car day is a workable measure, I personally believe that there are other methods of more effectiveness in alleviating this contamination.
There are several grounds for arguing than an international car-free day can reduce air pollution severity. Firstly, exhaust fumes could be cut off which diminishes the carbon footprint, the primary cause of Greenhouse Effect. This expectation stems from the huge success of the Earth hour program that has been globally conducted for many years and made significant contribution to reduce the electricity consumption. Secondly, on that day, commuters have to opt for other means of transportation such as walking, bus or subway and as a result, they may be aware of the mobility and convenience of those methods in comparison with cars. Thus, this way can cultivate a better commuting habits among residents in the long run.
On the other hand, I think this answer is not feasible and sustainable enough as it lasts for only one day. Instead, what is worth noting is that the main culprit of air contamination is exhaust fumes from industry, so there would be an international collaboration in setting a limit its emission. In fact, the 24th C.O.P conference held in Paris agreed that if American cut down its industrial fumes by 5%, the Global warming rate will decrease by 8%. Another important measure should be investment in energy-efficient engines so that commuters not only greatly benefit from the comfort and safety of cars but the quantity of air pollutants in the atmosphere is controlled.
In conclusion, the program to encourage motorists to give up their car for one day is a good idea to deal with pollution, but the government need to simultaneously take other measures as global cooperation and advancement of car technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Zari | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-22 | navkhehra | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative 78
- The diagram below shows the process of collecting rain water for use in an Australian town. 89
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular.Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.What are your opinions in this? 56
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 84
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: P
...mit its emission. In fact, the 24th C.O.P conference held in Paris agreed that if...
^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...%. Another important measure should be investment in energy-efficient engines so that com...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12861736334 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06998020948 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633440514469 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3293171233 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269106338616 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086582826018 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070014042373 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15731352706 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448313365634 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.