Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Environmental degradation is one of the most alarming issues that we are facing. While some
people agree that the most feasible measure to deal with this problem is to raise the price of
fuel, I think it is an effective solution, but far from being the best.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the higher cost of fuel will exert many constructive
influences on dealing with environmental contamination. The higher gas, petrol and oil price
is, the fewer people burn for commuting demand. For this reason, CO2 emissions will decline
dramatically, diminishing CO2 footprint. Furthermore, this money can be invested in
reducing the quantity of pollutants released into the air. For example, the government will have
more funding for research projects to find out eco-friendly energy sources or upgrade
a pollutant treating system, so the environment can be protected.
On the other hand, this solution, albeit protective and preventive, is not the most effective
way to address contamination. The major reason is that this policy can solve air pollution
without any influences on other culprits also damaging environments such as intensive
farming, overpopulation or the illegal disposal of waste from factories. Therefore, the
implementation of the higher cost of fuel can only reduce the acceleration of contamination
insignificantly. Instead, each individual needs to live a greener and kinder life to the
environment by classifying waste, using eco-friendly energy or simply walking more.
The government should hold programs to raise people’s awareness of the consequences of their
actions on the surrounding environment and their future life so that they will take responsibility
for their own actions.
In conclusion, although charging a skyrocketing price on fuel can protect the environment, it
is not the most workable measure and there are more effective and vital solutions that should
be done to maintain sustainable development.</span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy in 2002 and projection for 2050. 78
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 73
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- The figure below is a town planning map Showing the likely position of new shopping centers as well as the various different zones and major transportation route of the town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69836065574 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.6482920575 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7239891661 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.692307692 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214732531289 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072436039579 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592538485613 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520703822547 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481884018867 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.