Indivisuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make difference.
Environment polluted seriously has become a controversial issue. Some people argued that a person cannot alone solve the problem but the governments and large companies can. From my understanding both side have their advantage.
In the first case, a huge group of people would have more effective and ideas when it come to action. Having said that, governments and enterprises possess an enourmous budget which indispensible to hire facilities and workers in order to improve environment. Moreover, citizens pays tax to governments, they have to responsible for their duties. Companies also play an important role in polluted or clean natural. It is believed that most of factories release emisson directly which damaged environment badly. Only by reducing their contribution to this problem did the environment can be improved.
In second case, it is no doubt about the crucial of indivisuals position in this combat to protect nature. No matter how huge governments or companies is, it still formed from many indivisuals and If those indivisuals don’t take any action then the whole group would fail its mission. One person may not improve the situation immediately but gradually would influent and inspired to surrounded people. For example, a person who throw litlle on streets and many others immitate his action. Although governments can implement laws but without law-abiding from indivisual, they can not solve the issue completely.
In conclusion, it is clearly to see that government and indivisuals have strong conection in recovering the nature. A group of people may bring more effective. In contrast, a person action may be considered as unremarkable but without “unremarkable” from many indivisuals then would be gloomy environment where everyone blame for each other irrespossible.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of wether the course 61
- Parents are the best teachers. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Indivisuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make difference. 78
- In some contries, the average weight of people is increasing, and their levels of health and fitness are decresing. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say thath the best preparation for life is learning to be co-operative. Other take the opposite view and say that learning to be competitive is the best preparation. Tell which one you agree with and explain why. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding both side have their advantage. In the first case, a huge group of peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...d have more effective and ideas when it come to action. Having said that, government...
^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the factories') or simply say ''most factories''.
Suggestion: most of the factories; most factories
...d or clean natural. It is believed that most of factories release emisson directly which damaged ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m did the environment can be improved. In second case, it is no doubt about the...
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l of indivisuals position in this combat to protect nature. No matter how huge go...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can not solve the issue completely. In conclusion, it is clearly to see that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49285714286 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20136291129 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9511167166 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4705882353 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213418462913 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587875537222 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069814922971 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126269661616 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441055483317 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.