The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The map shows two potential sites (S1 and S2) for a new supermarket in a town called Garlsdon.
It is noticeable that the main difference between the two sites is that S1 is outside of the town, whereas S2 is in the town center. The sites can also be compared in term of access by roads and railway, and their position relative to three smaller towns.
Look at the first site, S1 is located in the countryside to the northwest of Garlsdon, but it is close to the residential areas of the town. S2 is also close to the housing areas which surrounds the town center.
There are three main roads from Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon to Garlsdon’s town center, but this is no traffic zone so people cannot access S2 by car. By contrast, S1 can be accessed easily from Hindon at about 12 kilometers, but hardly from Brandsdon and Cransdon. Both supermarket sites are close to the railway which runs through Garlsdon from Cransdon to Hindon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 84
- The maps the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 91
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country's success? Do you think one factor is more 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59968491899 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0276295502 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249437836664 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129662325163 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137120957361 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200327402649 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152693882802 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.