The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the disparity in the percentage of households’ car ownership in the Great Britain from 1961 to 2001. there are three different trends of ownership are being described. As can be seen from the chart, having a car in the house in the 1960s was not a popular trend as it is in the 2000s.
In 1961, around 65% of the british households did not have any cars while there was half of those who owned a car, and none of those had two cars or more than that at the time.
For the next 20 years, the trend had changed significantly. Specifically, the proportion of british families own no cars halved than the previous period, and there was 15% of those own more than two cars while the proportion of families have one car increased considerably by 15%.
During the next 20 years period, british famillies that have one car were still the majority (around 45%), although the percentage decreased slightly. there was a suprisingly grow in the percentage of households with two or other cars with the record of just slightly under 30%. Contrastively, a huge decline has been experienced in the percentage of families without cars (less than 30%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-30 | hellangel2130 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | trpg143 | 87 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | trpg143 | 74 | view |
| 2019-05-14 | trpg143 | 71 | view |
| 2019-02-25 | nhu11104884 | 71 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 61
- In many parts of the world, people search for family history. Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do, but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations. Discuss both views and show your 67
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems? 67
- It is said that the amount of violence on the TV programs has negative effect on our social development and therefore should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...in the Great Britain from 1961 to 2001. there are three different trends of ownership...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two cars or more than that at the time. For the next 20 years, the trend had cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ough the percentage decreased slightly. there was a suprisingly grow in the percentag...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72195121951 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76014811352 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546341463415 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5324450595 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140211452357 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066028316407 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557448465283 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938725091549 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051739096195 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.