Some People believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Invention of robotic devices caused a major impact on many aspects of human life. While there are some negative opinions about the invention of robots, it seems to me that this creation has a positive influence on future societies.
Pessimistic views on the invention of robots have increased by the day. Many people argue that usage of these artificial creatures instead of people would heavily increase the unemployment rates. Factory owners prefer a physically needless alternative workforce, which can lead to more profitability. If this prediction came to reality, many will suffer the severe consequences (for example increased depression as a result of unemployment). In terms of using robots in the military sector, malfunctioning may result in dangerous events in the future. The theory of world annihilation by robots is not a secret anymore, which will likely cause by unintentional sabotage in the robots behavior programing. Changing their loyalty would be a predictable outcome.
On the other hand, I believe that there are more benefits in this creation. Capability and precision of robots in some applications made a positive influence on the necessity of developing this technology. Thanks to the perfect accuracy of robots, the chance of successful surgery operations has increased recently, and housekeeping tasks can be efficiently perform by maid-robots. Furthermore, tireless nature and higher quality production are other superiorities of robots, which made them a potential choice of a 24/7 operating workforce. For instance, these robots are a reliable option in 24/7 supermarkets, gas stations or industrial plants.
For the reasons above, I would argue that wide range of abilities can be expected from robots. Therefore, these numerous extraordinary functions can be a huge help to human being in many critical aspects of life, although some conspiracy theories must be taken seriously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | arianamirkiai | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at le 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart shows the sales figures and profits of ABC Electronics in millions of US dollars over the period 1991 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at leas 67
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work. 73
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'robots'' or 'robot's'?
Suggestion: robots'; robot's
... cause by unintentional sabotage in the robots behavior programing. Changing their loy...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52203389831 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10470355147 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6569826227 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193162832862 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629183606288 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551360588669 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112571583106 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576755100028 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.