The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The two pie charts illustrate the contribution to the economy of Turkey by proportion of different sectors in a 16-year time period.
At first glance, it was noticeable that the industry of agriculture had dipped the most, from 24% in 2000, to only 14% left in 2016. In addition, Leisure and hospitality and jobs from the government had the same decline, which was decreased by 3%
As the charts demonstrate, a few percentage of the sectors had risen. The least was the group of trade, utilities and transportation, which was only increased of 2%, while construction had the most surge of 7%. Both group of finance,business and other and manufacturing had slightly risen from 5% to 8% and 8% to 12% respectively. Healthcare and education, on the other hand, had remained the same percentage in this aforesaid period.
To sum up, it was evident that some of the industries had surged and declined, not to mention, only one of the sectors had stayed constant.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 56
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 56
- The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same decline, which was decreased by 3% As the charts demonstrate, a few percent...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'few percentages'.
Suggestion: few percentages
... by 3% As the charts demonstrate, a few percentage of the sectors had risen. The least was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , business
... most surge of 7%. Both group of finance,business and other and manufacturing had slightl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...iod. To sum up, it was evident that some of the industries had surged and declined, not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89634146341 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06621236041 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0119018108 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192710317541 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932518951754 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106796663718 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137451633862 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114708261504 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.