Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
In this modern world, there is an ongoing deliberation people on the way in treating poorer people around the globe. While some people argue that it’s the responsibility of wealthier nations to provide basic needs of the porer nations, on my point of view the government of each country bears the responsibility of providing such needs to their citizens.
First and foremost, the developed countries have achieved their status due to hard work and good governance concepts. The leaders and the citizens of that country have set policies and they work towards achieving a common goal. For example, most of the developed countries have anti corruption policies and they have a strict legal frame work which is common for all the citizens of the society. Therefore, they have efficient and effective set of policies which lead them to prosperity. If, these countries spend their funds to other nations, citizens of those countries will stand against them, because they could have used those funds for their prosperity without wasting on other countries which operates with mis management and corruption.
On the other hand, the governments of poor countries may avoid their responsibilities since those are satisfied with other governments. For instance, some governments spend more on infrastructure projects without considering the basic needs of their citizens. In addition, the organizations like United Nations work towards in managing those situation to mitigate the risks of poorer countries.
In conclusion, it is recommended, all governments to mainly focus on satisfying the basis needs of their citizens such as food, clean water, sanitation, shelter, education and health. The govenments, should set a clear percentage on each sector in order to avoid nutrition deficiencies, genocides and low literacy levels as well. Irrespective of the availability of funds the individuals have to select proper rulers to govern them towards future without depending on other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | junaid_sh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
- What is the influence of the region on person’s success? 55
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts 77
- In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why? Greatest invention in the last 100 years, medicine, science or technology? 61
- Governments should allocate most educational resources on science subjects. Do you agree? 77
- Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'those situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; those situations
...United Nations work towards in managing those situation to mitigate the risks of poorer countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46925566343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94142535466 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537216828479 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7966600304 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205952281106 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722391108986 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060215294507 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13958447729 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532460898565 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.