The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about measures to ensure road safety. However, whether imposing stricter penalties for driving offenses is the only way to protect people is still a controversial issue. Although I agree that harsher punishments can act as an effective way to deter people from committing road offenses, I believe that there are better methods to protect commuter’s welfare.
Firstly, it is obvious that the implementation of rules can change people’s attitudes toward violating laws. This means that if a driver is punished when he breaks a road rule, he will be in fear of gaining further punishment and avoid re-committing his offense. In addition, those who witness people receiving penalties may also realise the downsides of violating the laws and are unlikely to commit the same offence.
Furthermore, more severe punishments for traffic-related crimes can deter traffic accidents efficiently. For example, in the past, China witnessed a significant number of road casualties annually when it had very loosely enforced regulations. However, the once harsher laws related to road safety were implemented in 2009 there was a notable reduction in the total number of traffic accidents.
This is not to say that only by using stricter rules can we enhance the safety of our road. It is true that there are still other effective measures to ensure peoples safety, such as heightening people’s awareness through TV programs about the negatives of committing driving offenses or promoting the use of public transport systems such as buses or trains. To achieve the best results, the most effective method may be to combine all the aforementioned ideas.
In conclusion, in my opinion, stricter punishment is not the only way to deal with driving offenses. Measures including raising awareness and promoting the use of public transport systems can also contribute to maintaining road safet
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Whether or not someone achievestheir aimsis mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Whether or not someone achievestheir aimsis mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Tourism is an excellent way to develop a country but it can also cause harm How can countries ensure that tourism benefits the development 81
- People should look after their health for personal benefits, rather than a duty for a society. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40327868852 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02853223936 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4367575201 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201516824656 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748915965769 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708703545404 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115798136673 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463542201512 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.