It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on
people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that governments should focus on their citizens instead of helping others from foreign countries. While it is true that the authorities should support their residents, I believe it is also possible to help people from other nations.
To begin with, there are several reasons why governments should give priority to their own people. Firstly, as people pay taxes for their nations, they deserve good public services. Therefore, governments should spend budget on improving those services to give a better living condition to their citizens. Secondly, investing more in their own people leads to wealthier countries. For example, the authorities invest more in education to have a well-educated workforce, which contributes to making a competitive labor market.
However, I would argue that we can also assist people all over the world. First, there are still many poor countries which are in need of help. For example, the GDP of Bangladesh is one-fiftieth of the US and 30% of its residents do not have enough food. If rich countries are not willing to help the poor countries, many people could die due to lack of food. Furthermore, helping people also can earn respect from others. For instance, the US is respected by people around the world as this country is donating a big amount of money to help financially disadvantaged countries.
In conclusion, while local people need to be focused by their governments, I support the view that people from other parts of the world also needed to be helped.
- Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend? 73
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 56
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09561752988 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74799912346 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7055972655 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3571428571 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300990598174 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108773988112 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643614481916 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180432357063 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420826964045 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.