Governments should focus on people's life or technologies used for space travel. Use your personal example, to what extend you agree.
There are some disagreements about how government should spend the funds; whether on space explorations or they should invest the funds in other parts which is beneficial to people’s life. Personally, I tend to agree that governments should improve civic life quality.
There are some environmental problems that is still waiting governments invest money and technologies to solve. The greenhouse is the most common issue that the modern generation cares about. Temperate is gradually increasing yearly, and the ecosystem is affecting by the warming which flower blooms happened at the wrong season, such phenomena occurred as well as other species. Sea levels increased so some oceanic island may disappear as predicted in a few years. Therefore, governments are restricting carbon dioxide release, and have a specific financial account for researchers to innovate other green resources to replace toxin one which is expecting to ease global warming.
Another reason also needs governments attentions that is the life expectancy is getting longer. People can live longer than that of in the past due to the advanced technologies and improved health care services. There were some people died as small illness such as smallpox, but it is rarely or never heard this tragedy again in the 21st century. While people live longer, all the health care system which was created in the past two decades is too old that is not suitable now. Taiwan, has the issue that older people are lack of care especially when they are suffered by chronic disease and they have to go to the hospital everyday as the service system is not completely covered so that their children are unable to afford the bills.
In conclusion, although space exploration may bring some innovation the outcome is unpredictable and the input is numerous. Therefore, it is better to invest in environment and life expectancy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-06 | Karie Tseng | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | Karie Tseng | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | Karie Tseng | 80 | view |
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and are more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- Governments should focus on people's life or technologies used for space travel. Use your personal example, to what extend you agree. 80
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 91
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals? (2) 72
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion cares about. Temperate is gradually increasing yearly, and the ecosystem is ...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver heard this tragedy again in the 21st century. While people live longer, all t...
^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the issue that older people are lack of care especially when they are suffered b...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ase and they have to go to the hospital everyday as the service system is not completely...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23278688525 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78541137497 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.609608625 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146926441323 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502040339543 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450667679821 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929922027052 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559443293797 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.