The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The tables compare the percentages of British university students who spoke different languages in addition to English in two separate years.
It is noticeable that in both years, 2000 and 2010, the majority of British students at the university in question were able to speak at least one other language. We can also see an increase in the proportion of second and third language speakers over the 10-year period.
In the year 2000, 80% of the students were able to speak one or two foreign languages, and 20% only spoke English. Ten years later, there was a rise of 5% in the proportion of those who spoke a second language. There was also an increase, from 10% to 15%, in the proportion of students who were able to speak two foreign languages.
Looking at the specific second languages spoken, in 2000, 30% of the students were able to speak Spanish, 15% spoke French, and 10% spoke German. By 2010, the proportion of Spanish speakers had risen to 35%, there were 5% fewer French speakers, and the figure for German speakers remained at one in ten. Finally, we can see that the percentage of speakers of other second languages, apart from Spanish, French and German, rose from 15% to 20% over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The bar chart illustrates how often Americans came to fast food eateries from 2003 to 2013
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in own and rented accommodation in Wales and England between 1918 and 2011
- The percentage of inhabitants who had access to many communication services around the world. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, second, so, third, apart from, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74647887324 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47005473678 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483568075117 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5796522451 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402716400333 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183192306244 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117206732426 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267449275267 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063186737002 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.