The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The fast food consumption in the UK between 1970 and 1990 is presented in the line graph.
Overall, the consumption of fish & chips and hamburger rose dramatically while the pizza consumption showed the reverse. Also, more people in the UK preferred to consume fish & chips compared to other fast food.
The figures for fish and chips consumption rose steadily from virtually 100 t0 150 grams between 1970 and 1980, a rise of around 50 in a 10-year period. Again, the consumption of hamburger increased slightly by more or less 70. By contrast, a steady decrease was seen in the amount of pizza consumed to just about 200.
By 1990, both figures for fish and chips and hamburger had consumed to incline dramatically. The former chart had shown had tripled increase and reached by far the most popular fast food consumed by British while the later one had increased to almost the pizza's figure in the beginning of the year. After a long period of a steady decline, the one for pizza had re-bounced back to just 200.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The different modes of transport used to travels to and from work in one European city in1960, 1980 and 2000 61
- The Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas between 1985 and 1990. 73
- Some people believe that following children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78531073446 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5615606491 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5702220001 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30778521638 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137000821464 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164423892712 0.0843802449381 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249319909189 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192259041688 0.0819641961636 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.