car using
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on individual limit to use car can lead thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exits on either sides, when the citizens reduce car usage, the environment will be safer.
First and foremost, there are numerous reasons of my stance. To commence with, using of cars can increase air pollution and carbon foot print measures. Moreover, it is crucial to note that not only the climate changes phenomenon can raise significantly, but also the sea level may be raised which will lead to that all creatures to be endangered. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the governments should put more restricted measures to control the above phenomenon.
Secondly, anther pivotal aspect of the argument is that people use eco-friendly methods of transportation can lead to more clean air. Additionally, when people will use bicycles, individuals' health may be better. Consequently, it exemplified that the Non Governmental Organizations have to launch awareness campaigns to shed more light on the above points.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above notions, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support the above ideas, and hence my opinion is that not using cars can lead to more clean environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | aymanwahab | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r usage, the environment will be safer. First and foremost, there are numerous r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44239631336 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21967158568 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4173522614 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268803497037 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106871735404 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104371038878 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17402868614 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504215985515 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.