The line graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2040.
The figure elucidates the percentage of mature people’s population in three different nations. At first glance, it is evident that Japan has a different pattern in comparison with the other two states.
To begin with, the number of older individuals in Japan experienced a significant drop between 1940, which made up at 5%, and 1980, which constituted at just below a twentieth. Afterwards, it, erratically, uplifted tremendously over the following 60 years, soaring to just across a fourth by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, 1940 to 1980 witnessed a dramatic growth for the population of aged 65 and over in Sweden and USA where it, initially, stood at well under a tenth for Sweden and at well beyond 5% for USA, and achieved to just below 15% and three-twentieths respectively. Unexpectedly, both of these countries palpitated considerably in the next 60 years where it terminated to 25% for Sweden and well over a fifth for USA in 2040.
- the maps show changes in meadow side and fonton 1962 1985 and the present time 71
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- the changes of merton from 1990 to 2012. 78
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Please, discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 11
- The diagrams below illustrate changes affected in the district park between 2004 and 2014 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98757763975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12013983003 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627329192547 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7005884669 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232609682708 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932669282684 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708614437022 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126432628278 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787018375421 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.