Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples.
In the age of satellite dishes, all activities are gradually being automated and human beings are separating from orthodox and traditional tools. As such, some people avail themselves of the internet instead of public libraries. While few argue there is no need to public libraries, others are concerned that its elimination has negative ramifications. The aim of this essay is to explore two opposing viewpoints regarding whether the existence of libraries is necessary or is extra expenditure on the shoulder of government, and then render my own.
On one side of the argument there are people who put forward that public libraries play a crucial role in societies. To begin, a public library is often the heart and soul of a community as well as embodiment of progress of countries. To illustrate, nation library of the US, which is in the heart of Manhattan, now is turned to symbol of sturdy and robust science of America. On top of that they often host cultural event and communities activities. Therefore, they could not be ignored. Finally, it seems that its removal is tantamount to hurt on cultural heritage.
Nevertheless, with the advent of technology public libraries are becoming less popular amongst the populace. Firstly, books which are lent to persons become damaged and stained and they wear away over the time, leading to extra costs to replace them. For instance, the estimations reveal that more than 2.5 million dollars need to maintain, repair and substitution of second-hand books. Moreover, people can access to information on the internet just by a click and much faster than finding a book in libraries. Thus, paucity of their existence can help to government to spend their dedicated money to other sections.
I would therefore argue that even though I like the public libraries, but the price of their maintenance is exorbitant. All in all, I believe it is not plausible to get rid of them, but just their numbers should be reduced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-16 | ata | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 71 | view |
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- Many people today find that the cost of attaining a University-level education is extremely high for the students and their families. What are the causes of this situation, and how can governments, Universities and the students themselves overcome the pr 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted 73
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 73
- Some people believe that a government's responsibility should provide care and financial support for people after they retire other say individuals should save during their working year to fund their own retirement. Do you agree or disagree, and what is y 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03669724771 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82842051188 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2735787552 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142339146784 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412477909184 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044422647496 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770507939418 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430025405176 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.