The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years.
The first bar chart compares the total number of American couples who got married and who chose to divorce over a period of 30 years. The second one shows the percentage of four different marital status in the USA in the years 1970 and 2000.
It is clear that there were much more marriages than divorces over the period shown. Also, the proportion of married adults was the highest in both years.
In 1970, 5 million residents in the US got married, while only 1 million couples ended their marriage. In the following ten years, USA saw an increase in the number of divorces, rising from 1 million to approximately 1.4 million, whereas the figure for marriages kept the same. By 2000, the number of marriages had fallen by 0.5 million, and people saw the number of divorces decline by a similar amount.
Looking at the details in the second illustration, 70% of adults were married in 1970, which was significantly higher than any other three status. Never married, widowed, and divorced status only took roughly 15%, 8%, and 2% respectively. Thirty years later, the percentage of married citizens decreased by around 10 percent. By contrast, the equivalent figure for never married people and divorced persons rose by 5% and 6% respectively. The proportion of the widowed status remained relatively stable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. 62
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97285067873 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62099946848 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.101536225 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226945889631 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787641896718 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487398739405 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136720069078 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395460140315 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.