Number of men and women in different evening courses
The bar chart illustrates the number of men and women enrolled in four different evening courses at an adult education institution in the year 2009, while the pie chart displays the proportion of different age groups.
Overall, it is witnessed that number of females joined in various courses were high except in the sculpture course. On the other hand, it can be observed that the proportion of the elderly group was higher as compared to the proportion of the young group.
To commence with, the number of females who took admission in Drama was 20, which was double than the number of males in the same class. In Painting course, both the genders showed more interest, 25 were females and 30 were males. However, Sculpture course was failed to attract the aspirants, 20 females in comparison with 10 males. On the other hand, Language course attracted the highest women than men.
Looking towards pie chart, 42% of people who belong to the age group of 50 or over, showed the highest interest in enrolling different evening courses. Whereas, the percentage of registrations of the age group under 20 was at 5%, which was the least.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- expenditure on a movie-making process. 84
- Number of men and women in different evening courses 61
- pie chart on a movie budget expenditure 84
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 61
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...portion of the elderly group was higher as compared to the proportion of the young...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87692307692 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50189146068 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3423620136 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305170643418 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118114040179 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127823245676 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183782013906 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131847501968 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.