In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays, in many countries, it is said that more and more people in modern cities select live alone or in small family units, instead of in large families. I think that this trend is positive. This essay will present my view.
The first positive point of this trend is that people could feel more pleasant when living alone or in small households because it allows them to enjoy life in their own way. In fact that it is difficult to get along with all other members of an extended family. So, living alone or in a small family is the best solution to reducing the conflicts among members. As a result, the family atmosphere would become more laid-back if fewer people live together. For example, lots of people have been stressful when dealing with the difference between modern parents and backward grandparents on how to bring up kids.
The second positive point of this trend is that it helps people more independence. If living in an extended family, there is one benefit that people could be gotten is that supporting from relatives. However, many people favor in do nothing, but only relying on others. Living alone or in a small household that could help people learn how to manage to, such as take care of themselves, cover self-living costs. That is extremely necessary for modern societies.
In conclusion, with the above reasons mentioned, I believe that the trend which people in modern cities prefer living alone or in small family units to in large families is positive.
- Some people think that it is nescessary to control the children event from little. What to extent to agree or disagree? 61
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 61
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 61
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80544747082 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4486242511 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3026174978 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2142857143 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394028509851 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129171365147 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902978869643 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266645551794 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448701735865 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.